7 Ways To Screw Up A Table of Authorities

When I got my first streaming video device a few years back, I spent an embarrassing amount of time binge-watching the dizzying array of streaming video I suddenly had access to. One of my early obsessions was a video series on Chow.com’s channel called “You’re Doing It All Wrong”. (I do love me some food porn.) Thanks to that series, I now know what’s wrong with most people’s mashed potatoes (not boiled long enough), how to pan fry bacon properly (look for the bubbles), and why sushi chefs laugh at me (only noobs dunk the entire roll in soy sauce and then cram it in their faces with chopsticks).

I’m pretty sure the owners of Chow.com have the phrase “You’re Doing It All Wrong” trademarked or something; otherwise, I’d steal that phrase for an article series. And I know just where I’d start: Tables of Authorities.

Microsoft Word’s Table of Authorities feature isn’t exactly known for its user-friendliness. Nobody’s ever said the word “automagically” about it. And more than one enterprising software vendor has found a lucrative niche making an easier-to-use interface for TOAs.

I’ve had to use this feature myself on several occasions recently, and I’ve rediscovered seven ways you can easily (and thoroughly) screw up a Table of Authorities. (Need a TOA refresher course? Click here.)

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: don’t mark your citations while you’re still writing your brief. You may think you’re getting ahead of the game, but what you’re actually doing is setting yourself up to fail.

Why? Because every time you mark a citation, you leave behind an invisible code containing the information that Microsoft Word will need to create your Table of Authorities.

If you’re still at that stage of editing in which you’re moving large blocks of text around, you risk doing one of two things:

An example of a TOA code for the first occurrence of an authority citation

While you don’t have to have your brief 100% final before marking your citations, you do want to have major editing complete before you start working on your Table of Authorities.

A lot of users, once they’ve generated their Table of Authorities, see errors they need to fix—authorities appearing in the wrong section, citations that don’t meet Bluebook standards, etc. So they think, quite logically, that all they need to do is go back into the brief and re-mark the offending citations.

But going back for a do-over doesn’t correct the invisible code that’s there. It simply adds another code, creating even more confusion and error.

You’d be far better off learning how to interpret and edit the three parts of a TOA code:

If all else fails, you can always delete TOA codes and re-mark the citations. But being able to correct errors in TOA codes is a skill I think everyone who uses Microsoft Word’s Table of Authorities feature ought to have.

Ideally, the first time you cite a particular case or other authority, the citation should be formatted properly according to whatever system of citation you’re using. When you select the text of a citation before marking it, be sure to select the entire case name, reporter, court and year information. Selecting the entire citation (with either your mouse or your keyboard) before marking the citation ensures that all of this information is available to the Table of Authorities.

Select all of this text; you can always remove pincites in the TOA code.

Often, though, that first citation is a pinpoint citation (or “pincite”) which contains some information you don’t want listed in your Table of Authorities. In the Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. example above, “, 21” shouldn’t appear in the long citation part of the TOA code because that information is not properly listed in the Table of Authorities. Once I marked that citation, I manually removed the “, 21” from the text following the l code (see the second illustration under #1, above).

Again, here’s where knowing how to edit a TOA code comes in handy.

If you’re not careful as you’re marking citations, you can accidentally put a case in the Statutes section. The Category setting carries over from the last citation you marked, so if the last authority you marked was a Statute, the Category will default to Statute until you change it again. Word’s not smart enough to realize that an authority like Harris v. Forklift Systems is a court case.

Always, always, always check this before clicking Mark!

The “short citation” in a TOA code isn’t something anyone is ever going to see. That said, if you can discipline yourself to refer to a particular authority the same way throughout the remainder of your brief and then use that shorthand reference as your short citation, you can take advantage of the “Mark All” button (on the left in the illustration above). If, however, you sometimes refer to Harris v. Forklist Systems, Inc. as “Harris” and other times as “Harris v. Forklift Systems“, you’ll be forced to mark each subsequent citation manually.

Sometimes, though, it simply can’t be helped. For example, you may be able to shorthand a statute as “§ 5839” all through your text, but you can’t start a sentence with a section symbol. In that case, “Mark All” can catch most of the instances, but you’ll still need to double-check for the one(s) listed as “Section 5839”.

The only text formatting you should have within the TOA code is the italics or underline (not both) for a case name. Don’t attempt to fix problems with the formatting (font size, etc.) of the TOA itself here; that’s what TOA Styles are for.

I am far too paranoid not to go back behind Microsoft Word to make sure everything’s marked properly and to check for orphaned codes, etc. Yes, it makes my eyes hurt to turn on Show/Hide (it’s that paragraph symbol right in the middle of the Home tab) and review all those TOA codes, but I do it. I suggest you do the same.

I also recommend lining up another person to help you proofread: one person (preferably someone who hasn’t had to read it multiple times before) to go through the brief and call out “Harris v. Forklift Systems, page 12″ while you check it off on the Table of Authorities Word has generated. Yes, it’s time-consuming … but you want your brief to be perfect, right?